Reproducibility of measurement of myometrial invasion in endometrial carcinoma

dc.contributor.authorvan der Putten, Louis J. M.
dc.contributor.authorvan de Vijver, Koen
dc.contributor.authorBartosch, Carla
dc.contributor.authorDavidson, Ben
dc.contributor.authorGatius Calderó, Sònia
dc.contributor.authorMatias-Guiu, Xavier
dc.contributor.authorMcCluggage, W. Glenn
dc.contributor.authorToledo, Gemma
dc.contributor.authorvan der Wurff, Anneke A. M.
dc.contributor.authorPijnenborg, Johanna M. A.
dc.contributor.authorMassuger, Leon F. A. G.
dc.contributor.authorBulten, Johan
dc.date.accessioned2016-11-18T11:16:45Z
dc.date.available2016-11-18T11:16:45Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.description.abstractMyometrial invasion (MI) as a percentage (%MI), categorized into <50 or ≥50 %, is an important predictor of prognosis in endometrial carcinoma. Recent studies suggest that tumor-free distance (TFD) to serosa and the absolute depth of invasion (DOI) might be stronger predictors of prognosis. Although reproducibility is important in clinical practice for patient prognostication and treatment, reproducibility of these methods for the measurement of MI is largely unknown. One or two slides from 50 patients with FIGO stage I endometrioid endometrial carcinoma were viewed by seven gynecological pathologists, who were requested to measure %MI, TFD, and DOI. We categorized %MI as <50 % (including no MI) or ≥50 %, TFD as ≤1.75 or >1.75 mm (including no MI), ≤7 or >7 mm (including no MI), and ≤10 or >10 mm (including no MI) and DOI as <4 mm (including no MI) or ≥4 mm. Light’s kappa for multi-rater agreement was calculated. The %MI, TFD, and DOI could be measured in 88, 83, and 79 % of cases, respectively. Kappa was 0.75 for %MI, 0.77, 0.73, and 0.69 respectively for TFD with cutoffs of 1.75, 7, and 10 mm, and 0.59 for DOI. Pathologists reach substantial agreement when measuring %MI and TFD and moderate agreement when measuring DOI. The %MI can be measured in more cases than TFD and DOI. This supports the use of %MI in daily clinical practice, but future studies should compare %MI and TFD more extensively, including inter-observer variability.ca_ES
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-016-2035-5
dc.identifier.issn0945-6317
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10459.1/58578
dc.language.isoengca_ES
dc.publisherSpringer Berlin Heidelbergca_ES
dc.relation.isformatofReproducció del document publicat a https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-016-2035-5ca_ES
dc.relation.ispartofVirchows Archiv, 2016, p. 1-6ca_ES
dc.rightscc-by (c) van der Putten, Louis J. M., et al. 2016ca_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessca_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/*
dc.subjectEndometrial carcinomaca_ES
dc.subjectMyometrial invasionca_ES
dc.subjectDepth of invasionca_ES
dc.subjectTumor-free distanceca_ES
dc.subjectInter-observer variabilityca_ES
dc.titleReproducibility of measurement of myometrial invasion in endometrial carcinomaca_ES
dc.typearticleca_ES
dc.type.versionpublishedVersionca_ES
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
virarc_a2016p1.pdf
Size:
886.73 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: