Mechanical properties of wood from Pinus sylvestris L. treated with Light Organic Solvent Preservative and with waterbone Copper Azole

dc.contributor.authorVillasante Plágaro, Antonio M.
dc.contributor.authorLaina, Ruben
dc.contributor.authorRojas, J. A. M.
dc.contributor.authorRojas, I. M.
dc.contributor.authorVignote, Santiago
dc.date.accessioned2015-11-23T11:20:54Z
dc.date.available2015-11-23T11:20:54Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.description.abstractAim of study: To determine the effect on wood from Pinus sylvestris of treatment with preservatives on mechanical properties and to establish the relation between the penetration and compression strenght. Area of study: Spain. Material and methods: 40 samples of defect-free wood from Pinus sylvestris L. were treated with Light Organic Solvent Preservative (Vacsol Azure WR 2601) and 50 with waterborne Copper Azole (Tanalith E 3492). 40 control samples were not treated (water or preservative). Mechanical resistance to static bending, modulus of elasticity and compression strength parallel to the grain were compared with untreated wood. Regression analysis between the penetration and compression strength parallel was done with the samples treated with waterborne preservative. Main results: The results indicate that the treated wood (with either product) presents a statistically significant increase in mechanical resistance in all three mechanical characteristics. The results obtained differ from earlier studies carried out by other authors. There was no correlation between parallel compression strength and the degree of impregnation of the wood with waterborne Copper Azole. The most probable explanation for these results concerns changes in pressure during treatment. The use of untreated control samples instead of samples treated only with water is more likely to produce significant results in the mechanical resistance studies. Research highlights: Treated wood presents a statistically significant increase in MOE, modulus of rupture to static bending and parallel compression strength. There was no correlation between parallel compression strength and the degree of impregnation with waterborne preservative.ca_ES
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.5424/fs/2013223-03857
dc.identifier.idgrec021757
dc.identifier.issn2171-5068
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10459.1/49029
dc.language.isoengca_ES
dc.publisherINIAca_ES
dc.relation.isformatofReproducció del document publicat a https://doi.org/10.5424/fs/2013223-03857ca_ES
dc.relation.ispartofForest Systems, 2013, vol. 22, núm. 3, p. 416-422ca_ES
dc.rights(c) INIA, 2013ca_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessca_ES
dc.subjectLight Organic Solvent Preservativeca_ES
dc.subjectMOEca_ES
dc.subjectParallel compressionca_ES
dc.titleMechanical properties of wood from Pinus sylvestris L. treated with Light Organic Solvent Preservative and with waterbone Copper Azoleca_ES
dc.typearticleca_ES
dc.type.versionpublishedVersionca_ES
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
021757.pdf
Size:
140.97 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: