Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorEvans, Luke Christopher
dc.contributor.authorMelero Clavero, Yolanda
dc.contributor.authorSchmuki, Reto
dc.contributor.authorBoersch-Supan, Philipp H.
dc.contributor.authorBrotons, Lluís
dc.contributor.authorFontaine, Colin
dc.contributor.authorJiguet, Frédéric
dc.contributor.authorKuussaari, Mikko
dc.contributor.authorMassimino, Dario
dc.contributor.authorRobinson, Robert A.
dc.contributor.authorRoy, David B.
dc.contributor.authorSchweiger, Oliver
dc.contributor.authorSettele, Josef
dc.contributor.authorStefanescu, Constanti
dc.contributor.authorvan Turnhout, Chris A.M.
dc.contributor.authorOliver, Tom Henry
dc.date.accessioned2022-07-29T11:52:25Z
dc.date.available2022-07-29T11:52:25Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.issn1466-822X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10459.1/83695
dc.description.abstractAim: It is important to understand the factors affecting community stability because ecosystem function is increasingly at risk from biodiversity loss. Here, we evaluate how a key factor, the position of local environmental conditions within the thermal range of the species, influences the stability of butterfly communities at a continental scale.Location: Spain, UK and Finland.Time period: 1999– 2017.Major taxa studied: Butterflies.Methods: We tested the following hypotheses about how species responses to tem-perature anomalies aggregate to influence stability: Hypothesis 1, species have con-trasting responses to local temperature anomalies at opposing edges of their thermal range; hypothesis 2, communities with central thermal range positions have higher community stability; and the impacts of thermal range position on community stabil-ity are driven by hypothesis 3, population asynchrony, or hypothesis 4, additive popu-lation stability. Data were analysed at 876 sites for 157 species.Results: We found some support for hypothesis 1, because there were interactions be-tween thermal range and response to temperature anomalies such that species at dif-ferent range edges could provide weak compensatory dynamics. However, responses were nonlinear, suggesting strong declines with extreme anomalies, particularly at the hot range edge. Hypothesis 2 was supported in part, because community stabil-ity increased with central thermal range positions and declined at the edges, after accounting for species richness and community abundance. Thermal range position was weakly correlated with asynchrony (hypothesis 3) and population stability (hy-pothesis 4), although species richness and population abundance had larger impacts. Main conclusions: Future extreme heat events will be likely to impact species nega-tively across their thermal range, but might be particularly impactful on populations at the hottest end of the thermal range. Thermal range position influenced community stability because range edge communities were stable. However, the prediction of community stability from thermal range position is challenging because of nonlinear responses to temperature, with small temperature anomalies producing weak com-pensatory dynamics, but large extreme events synchronizing dynamics.ca_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipThe UK butterfly monitoring scheme is organized and funded by Butterfly Conservation, the Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, British Trust for Ornithology and the Joint Nature Conservation Committee. The Catalan butterfly monitoring scheme is funded by the Catalan Government, the Barcelona Provincial Council and other local partners. The Catalan butterfly monitoring scheme also incorpo-rates the Andora butterfly monitoring scheme, which is run by Centre d'Estudis de la Neu i la Mutanya d'Andorra (CENMA) and funded by Govern d'Andorra. The Finnish butterfly monitoring scheme is organ-ized and funded by the Finnish Environment Institute (SYKE).
dc.language.isoengca_ES
dc.publisherWileyca_ES
dc.relation.isformatofReproducció del document publicat a https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.13527ca_ES
dc.relation.ispartofGlobal Ecology and Biogeography, 2022, vol. 31, núm. 8, p. 1542-1555ca_ES
dc.rightscc-by, (c) Evans et al., 2022ca_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subjectasynchronyca_ES
dc.subjectbiodiversityca_ES
dc.subjectbiogeographyca_ES
dc.subjectcommunity stabilityca_ES
dc.subjectdiversity–stabilityca_ES
dc.subjectinsectsca_ES
dc.subjectintegrated Laplace approximationca_ES
dc.subjectlong-term monitoringca_ES
dc.subjectrange positionca_ES
dc.titleBioclimatic context of species' populations determines community stabilityca_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleca_ES
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionca_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessca_ES
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1111/geb.13527


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

cc-by, (c) Evans et al., 2022
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as cc-by, (c) Evans et al., 2022