Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBoskovic, Irena
dc.contributor.authorTejada Gallardo, Claudia
dc.contributor.authorVrij, Aldert
dc.contributor.authorHope, Lorraine
dc.contributor.authorMerckelbach, Harald
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-20T06:38:24Z
dc.date.available2021-04-20T06:38:24Z
dc.date.issued2018-06-28
dc.identifier.issn1321-8719
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10459.1/71066
dc.description.abstractSeveral studies on the verifiability approach found that truth-tellers report more verifiable details than liars. Therefore, we wanted to test whether such a difference would emerge in the context of malingered symptoms. We obtained statements from undergraduates (N D 53) who had been allocated to three different conditions: truth-tellers, coached malingerers and na ıve malingerers. Truth-tellers carried out an intensive physical exercise and after a short interval wrote a report about their experience and elicited symptoms. The two malingering groups had to fabricate a story about the physical activity and its symptoms. Truth-tellers did not generate more verifiable details than malingerers. However, malingerers reported more non-verifiable details than truth-tellers. Coached and na ıve malingerers did not differ in this respect. Relative to truth-tellers, na ıve malingerers reported more symptoms-related nonverifiable details, while coached malingerers reported more exercise-related non-verifiable details. Focusing on non-verifiable details may inform the detection of malingered symptoms.
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work was supported by the House of Legal Psychology/Erasmus Mundus Joint Doctorate [Framework Partnership Agreement (FPA) 2013- 0036]; [Cohort 2015 with Specific Grant Agreement (SGA) 2015-1610].
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherInforma UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group
dc.relation.isformatofReproducció del document publicat a https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2018.1483272
dc.relation.ispartofPsychiatry Psychology and Law, 2019, vol. 26, núm. 1, p. 65-76
dc.rightscc-by-nc-nd (c) Tejada Gallardo et al., 2019
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subjectDeception detection
dc.subjectMalingering
dc.subjectSymptoms
dc.subjectVerifiability approach
dc.titleVerifiability on the run: an experimental study on the verifiability approach to malingered symptoms
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.date.updated2021-04-20T06:38:24Z
dc.identifier.idgrec028767
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2018.1483272


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

cc-by-nc-nd (c) Tejada Gallardo et al., 2019
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as cc-by-nc-nd (c) Tejada Gallardo et al., 2019