Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMarteau, Baptiste
dc.contributor.authorGibbins, Chris N.
dc.contributor.authorVericat Querol, Damià
dc.contributor.authorBatalla, Ramon J.
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-25T09:40:09Z
dc.date.available2020-11-25T09:40:09Z
dc.date.issued2020-07-26
dc.identifier.issn1535-1467
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10459.1/69950
dc.description.abstractThis paper describes changes in bed morpho‐dynamics and topography in the River Ehen, a regulated river in NW England (i.e., temperate climate) following a rehabilitation project that reconnected a formerly diverted headwater sub‐catchment back to its main‐stem. Sediment grain‐size distributions in the Ehen changed subtly and in rather complex ways following the reconnection. Changes were most evident in the riffle morphological unit, where gravel‐sized material accumulated in the first 2 years after the reconnection. All morphological units initially experienced an addition of fine sediment (size <8 mm) but by the end of the study the proportion of fine material in the bed matrix had returned to pre‐reconnection levels. Topographic changes were evident in some units, with net aggradation in the riffle and scour in the plane bed; there was no detectable change in the pool. Albeit limited, there was evidence of an increase in bed mobility, with field observations indicating that the new sediment is moving over the top of the largely static existing pavement, rather than interacting with it. Despite numerous uncertainties related mainly to the ephemeral nature of the tributary and, consequently, how much sediment it would deliver, evidence suggests that the main project objective is being met: there is a renewed supply of sediment now being delivered to the main‐stem Ehen at times and in quantities that are controlled by natural processes. Nevertheless, the river is still best considered to be in an adjustment phase, so assessment of its long term response to the reconnection requires continued monitoring.ca_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipThis study was funded as part of a PhD grant by the Environment Agency UK and United Utilities. DV was funded by a Ramon y Cajal fellowship (RYC‐2010‐06264) at the time of the study and is now funded by a Serra Húnter Fellowship at the University of Lleida. Authors acknowledge the support from the Economy and Knowledge department of the Catalan Government through the Consolidated Research Group “Fluvial Dynamics Research Group”‐RIUS (2014‐SGR‐645), and the additional support provided by the CERCA Programme, also from the Catalan Government.ca_ES
dc.language.isoengca_ES
dc.publisherJohn Wiley & Sons Ltdca_ES
dc.relation.isformatofReproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.3682ca_ES
dc.relation.ispartofRiver Research and Applications, 2020, vol. 36, núm. 8, p. 1472-1487ca_ES
dc.rightscc-by-nc-nd, (c) Marteau, Baptiste et al., 2020ca_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subjectBed mobilityca_ES
dc.subjectGeomorphological adjustmentsca_ES
dc.subjectGrain size distributionca_ES
dc.subjectHabitatca_ES
dc.subjectRiver Ehenca_ES
dc.subjectRiver rehabilitationca_ES
dc.titleGeomorphological response to system‐scale river rehabilitation II: Main‐stem channel adjustments following reconnection of an ephemeral tributaryca_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleca_ES
dc.identifier.idgrec030805
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionca_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessca_ES
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1002/rra.3682


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

cc-by-nc-nd, (c) Marteau, Baptiste et al., 2020
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as cc-by-nc-nd, (c) Marteau, Baptiste et al., 2020