Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBachand, Marianne
dc.contributor.authorPellerin, Stéphanie
dc.contributor.authorCôté, Steeve D.
dc.contributor.authorMoretti, Marco
dc.contributor.authorDe Cáceres, Miquel
dc.contributor.authorBrousseau, Pierre-Marc
dc.contributor.authorCloutier, Conrad
dc.contributor.authorHébert, Christian
dc.contributor.authorCardinal, Étienne
dc.contributor.authorMartin, Jean-Louis
dc.contributor.authorPoulin, Monique
dc.description.abstractIndicator species have been used successfully for estimating ecosystem integrity, but comparative studies for defining optimal taxonomic group remain scarce. Furthermore, species combinations may constitute more integrative tools than single species indicators, but case studies are needed to test their efficiency. We used Indicator Species Analysis, which statistically determines the association of species to one or several groups of sites, to obtain indicators of ecosystem recovery after various deer density reductions. We used five taxonomic groups: plants, carabid beetles, bees, moths and songbirds. To test whether species combinations could complement single indicator species, we used plants as a model taxon and examined the indicator value of joint occurrence of two or three plant species. Our study relies on experimental controlled browsing enclosures established for six years on Anticosti Island (Quebec). Four levels of deer density (0, 7.5 and 15 deer km−2 and natural densities between 27 and 56 deer km−2) were studied in two vegetation cover types (uncut forests and cut-over areas), in a full factorial design for a total of eight experimental treatments. For all taxa but bees, we tested 54 treatment groups consisting in one specific density or in a sequence of two or more consecutive deer densities in one or both cover types (ten groups for bees, sampled only in cut-over areas). We found 12 plants, 11 moths and one songbird to be single species indicators of ecosystem conditions obtained under 12 different treatment groups. Six treatment groups were indicated by plants and six different ones by moths, of which one group was also identified by a songbird species. Moths were thus worth the extra sampling effort, especially since the groups they indicated were more treatment-specific (mainly one or two deer density treatments). We tested the same 54 treatment groups for plant species combinations represented by two or three co-occurring species. Plant combinations efficiently complemented plant singletons for detecting ecosystem conditions obtained under various deer densities. In fact, although singletons were highly predictive, 17 additional treatment groups were identified exclusively with two- and three-species combinations, some being more treatment-specific. Our findings show that plants and moths provide complementary indicators of ecosystem conditions under various deer densities, and that computing species combinations increases our capacity to monitor ecosystem recovery after reducing herbivore densities.ca_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipFunding was provided by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)-Produits forestiers Anticosti Industrial Chair to SDC, the Ministère des Ressources Naturelles et de la Faune du Québec, the Canadian Forest Service of Natural Resources Canada and an NSERC scholarship to MB and NSERC DG to MP and SP. We are grateful to the Centre de la Science de la Biodiversité du Québec and Centre d’études nordiques for scholarships.ca_ES
dc.relation.isformatofVersió postprint del document publicat a:
dc.relation.ispartofEcological Indicators, 2014, vol. 38, p. 12-19ca_ES
dc.rightscc-by-nc-nd, (c) Elsevier, 2013ca_ES
dc.subjectEcosystem managementca_ES
dc.subjectIndicator value index (IndVal)ca_ES
dc.subjectPopulation controlca_ES
dc.subjectWhite-tailed deerca_ES
dc.titleSpecies indicators of ecosystem recovery after reducing large herbivore density: Comparing taxa and testing species combinationsca_ES

Files in this item


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

cc-by-nc-nd, (c) Elsevier, 2013
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as cc-by-nc-nd, (c) Elsevier, 2013