Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLeolini, Luisa
dc.contributor.authorCostafreda Aumedes, Sergi
dc.contributor.authorSantos, João A.
dc.contributor.authorMenz, Christoph
dc.contributor.authorFraga, Helder
dc.contributor.authorMolitor, Daniel
dc.contributor.authorMerante, Paolo
dc.contributor.authorJunk, Jürgen
dc.contributor.authorKartschall, Thomas
dc.contributor.authorDestrac-Irvine, Agnès
dc.contributor.authorVan Leeuwen, Cornelis
dc.contributor.authorMalheiro, Aureliano C.
dc.contributor.authorEiras-Dias, José
dc.contributor.authorSilvestre, José
dc.contributor.authorDibari, Camilla
dc.contributor.authorBindi, Marco
dc.contributor.authorMoriondo, Marco
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-10T09:13:14Z
dc.date.available2020-11-10T09:13:14Z
dc.date.issued2020-05-29
dc.identifier.issn2076-3417
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10459.1/69822
dc.description.abstractBudbreak date in grapevine is strictly dependent on temperature, and the correct simulation of its occurrence is of great interest since it may have major consequences on the final yield and quality. In this study, we evaluated the reliability for budbreak simulation of two modeling approaches, the chilling-forcing (CF), which describes the entire dormancy period (endo- and eco-dormancy) and the forcing approach (F), which only describes the eco-dormancy. For this, we selected six phenological models that apply CF and F in different ways, which were tested on budbreak simulation of eight grapevine varieties cultivated at different latitudes in Europe. Although none of the compared models showed a clear supremacy over the others, models based on CF showed a generally higher estimation accuracy than F where fixed starting dates were adopted. In the latter models, the accurate simulation of budbreak was dependent on the selection of the starting date for forcing accumulation that changes according to the latitude, whereas CF models were independent. Indeed, distinct thermal requirements were found for the grapevine varieties cultivated in Northern and Southern Europe. This implies the need to improve modeling of the dormancy period to avoid under- or over-estimations of budbreak date under different environmental conditions.ca_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipThis research was funded by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme, under the Clim4Vitis project: “Climate change impact mitigation for European viticulture: knowledge transfer for an integrated approach”, grant agreement no. 810176. It was also supported by FCT-Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology, under the project UIDB/04033/2020 and the French National Research Agency (ANR) in the frame of the Investments for the Future Program, within the cluster of excellence COTE (ANR-10-LABX-45).ca_ES
dc.language.isoengca_ES
dc.publisherMDPIca_ES
dc.relation.isformatofReproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.3390/app10113800ca_ES
dc.relation.ispartofApplied Sciences, 2020, vol. 10, núm. 11, p. 3800ca_ES
dc.rightscc-by (c) Leolini, Luisa et al., 2020ca_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectChilling-forcing modelsca_ES
dc.subjectDormancyca_ES
dc.subjectForcing modelsca_ES
dc.subjectPhenologyca_ES
dc.titlePhenological Model Intercomparison for Estimating Grapevine Budbreak Date (Vitis vinifera L.) in Europeca_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleca_ES
dc.identifier.idgrec030207
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionca_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessca_ES
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3390/app10113800
dc.relation.projectIDinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/H2020/810176/EU/Clim4Vitisca_ES


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

cc-by (c) Leolini, Luisa et al., 2020
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as cc-by (c) Leolini, Luisa et al., 2020