Acceptance or decline of requests to review manuscripts. A gender-based approach from a public health journal
Negrín, Miguel Ángel
Vives Cases, Carmen
López, M. José
MetadataShow full item record
Peer review in the scientific publication is widely used as a method to identify valuable knowledge. Editors have the task of selecting appropriate reviewers. We assessed the reasons given by potential reviewers for declining a request to review, and the factors associated with acceptance, taking into
account the difference in the sex of the reviewer. This is a descriptive study of the review requests from a public health journal (Gaceta Sanitaria) with an enforced gender policy. The dependent variables were requests, response to requests, reasons potential reviewers gave for declining requests and time to review. We carried out a descriptive analysis of these indicators and applied logistic regression to analyze factors (professional and research/review experience) associated with having done at least one review in 2014-2015. Results were stratified by sex. Journal editors sent 1,775 requests to 773 potential reviewers; 52.3% of whom reviewed at least one manuscript. Of the 396 declined requests (22.3%), the most common reasons were lack of time and of experience (88.1%). No differences were observed by sex. In the multivariate analysis, having reviewed for the journal in previous years showed the strongest association with acceptance. Specific analyses of data on requests reviewers may be useful for improving the acceptance rates to review. This study did not show gender differences in several indicators of the reviewing process.
Is part ofAccountability in Research, 2018 vol. 25, núm. 2, p. 94-108
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Baseline residual kidney function and its ensuing rate of decline interact to predict mortality of peritoneal dialysis patients Pérez Fontán, Miguel; Remón Rodríguez, César; Cunha Naveira, Marta da; Borràs, Mercè; Rodríguez Suárez, Carmen; Quirós Ganga, Pedro; Sánchez Alvarez, Emilio; Rodríguez Carmona, Ana (Public Library of Science, 2016)Background Baseline residual kidney function (RKF) and its rate of decline during follow-up are purported to be reliable outcome predictors of patients undergoing Peritoneal Dialysis (PD). The independent contribution ...
Improving the peer-review process and editorial quality: key errors escaping the review and editorial process in top scientific journals Margalida, Antoni; Colomer, M. Àngels (Maria Àngels) (PeerJ, 2016)We apply a novel mistake index to assess trends in the proportion of corrections published between 1993 and 2014 in Nature, Science and PNAS. The index revealed a progressive increase in the proportion of corrections ...
Gaceta Sanitaria en 2018. Fortalecimiento de la presencia en Latinoamérica y promoción de la publicación de temas esenciales para el Sistema Nacional de Salud Bermúdez-Tamayo, Clara; Negrín Hernández, Miguel; Alguacil, Juan; Briones Vozmediano, Erica Tula; Cantarero, David; Carrasco Portiño, Mercedes; Casino, Gonzalo; Castro Sánchez, Enrique; García Calvente, Mar; González Zapata, Laura Inés; Epstein, David; Hernan, Mariano; Posenato García, Leila; Ruiz Cantero, María Teresa; Segura, Andreu; Zunzunegui, María Victoria; Sarría, Antonio; Juárez, Lucero; Lumbreras, Blanca; Alvarez-Dardet, Carlos (ElsevierSociedad Española de Salud Pública y Administración Sanitaria, 2019)Una vez más, presentamos el informe de la actividad realizada por el equipo editorial a lo largo del año anterior y los datos de desempeño de la revista, con el fin de rendir cuentas a nuestros/as lectores/as, a las personas ...