Acceptance or decline of requests to review manuscripts. A gender-based approach from a public health journal

Thumbnail
View/Open
Issue date
2018
Author
Domínguez-Berjón, M.Felícitas
Godoy i García, Pere
Ruano-Ravina, Alberto
Negrín, Miguel Ángel
Vives Cases, Carmen
Álvarez-Dardet, Carlos
Bermúdez-Tamayo, Clara
López, M. José
Pérez, Glòria
Borrell, Carme
Suggested citation
Domínguez-Berjón, M.Felícitas; Godoy i García, Pere; Ruano-Ravina, Alberto; Negrín, Miguel Ángel; Vives Cases, Carmen; Álvarez-Dardet, Carlos; ... Borrell, Carme. (2018) . Acceptance or decline of requests to review manuscripts. A gender-based approach from a public health journal. Accountability in Research, 2018 vol. 25, núm. 2, p. 94-108. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2018.1435280.
Impact

Google Scholar logo  Google Scholar
Share
Export to Mendeley
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
Peer review in the scientific publication is widely used as a method to identify valuable knowledge. Editors have the task of selecting appropriate reviewers. We assessed the reasons given by potential reviewers for declining a request to review, and the factors associated with acceptance, taking into
account the difference in the sex of the reviewer. This is a descriptive study of the review requests from a public health journal (Gaceta Sanitaria) with an enforced gender policy. The dependent variables were requests, response to requests, reasons potential reviewers gave for declining requests and time to review. We carried out a descriptive analysis of these indicators and applied logistic regression to analyze factors (professional and research/review experience) associated with having done at least one review in 2014-2015. Results were stratified by sex. Journal editors sent 1,775 requests to 773 potential reviewers; 52.3% of whom reviewed at least one manuscript. Of the 396 declined requests (22.3%), the most common reasons were lack of time and of experience (88.1%). No differences were observed by sex. In the multivariate analysis, having reviewed for the journal in previous years showed the strongest association with acceptance. Specific analyses of data on requests reviewers may be useful for improving the acceptance rates to review. This study did not show gender differences in several indicators of the reviewing process.
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/10459.1/69105
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2018.1435280
Is part of
Accountability in Research, 2018 vol. 25, núm. 2, p. 94-108
Collections