Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCosta-Mateu, Joan
dc.contributor.authorFernández Rodríguez, Diego
dc.contributor.authorRivera, Kristian
dc.contributor.authorCasanova, Juan
dc.contributor.authorIrigaray, Patricia
dc.contributor.authorZielonka, Marta
dc.contributor.authorPereyra-Acha, Eduardo
dc.contributor.authorAldomá, Albina
dc.contributor.authorWorner, Fernando
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-25T10:27:53Z
dc.date.available2020-03-25T10:27:53Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.issn0066-782X
dc.identifier.issn1678-4170 (Online)
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10459.1/68333
dc.description.abstractBackground: Coronary angiography with two catheters is the traditional strategy for diagnostic coronary procedures. TIG I catheter permits to cannulate both coronary arteries, avoiding exchanging catheters during coronary angiography by transradial access. Objective: The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of one-catheter strategy, by avoiding catheter exchange, on coronary catheterization performance and economic costs. Methods: Transradial coronary diagnostic procedures conducted from January 2013 to June 2017 were collected. One-catheter strategy (TIG I catheter) and two-catheter strategy (left and right Judkins catheters) were compared. The volume of iodinated contrast administered was the primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints included radial spasm, procedural duration (fluoroscopy time) and exposure to ionizing radiation (dose-area product and air kerma). Direct economic costs were also evaluated. For statistical analyses, two-tailed p-values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Results: From a total of 1,953 procedures in 1,829 patients, 252 procedures were assigned to one-catheter strategy and 1,701 procedures to two-catheter strategy. There were no differences in baseline characteristics between the groups. One-catheter strategy required less iodinated contrast [primary endpoint; (60-105)-mL vs. 92 (64-120)-mL; p < 0.001] than the two-catheter strategy. Also, the one-catheter group presented less radial spasm (5.2% vs. 9.3%, p = 0.022) and shorter fluoroscopy time [3.9 (2.2-8.0)-min vs. 4.8 (2.9-8.3)-min, p = 0.001] and saved costs [149 (140-160)-€/procedure vs. 171 (160-183)-€/procedure; p < 0.001]. No differences in dose-area product and air kerma were detected between the groups. Conclusions: One-catheter strategy, with TIG I catheter, improves coronary catheterization performance and reduces economic costs compared to traditional two-catheter strategy in patients referred for coronary angiography.ca_ES
dc.language.isoengca_ES
dc.publisherSociedade Brasileira de Cardiologiaca_ES
dc.relation.isformatofReproducció del document publicat a https://doi.org/10.5935/abc.20190232ca_ES
dc.relation.ispartofArquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia, 2019, vol. 113, núm. 5, p. 960-968ca_ES
dc.rightscc-by, (c) Costa-Mateu et al., 2019ca_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subjectCineagiography/methodsca_ES
dc.subjectCardiac Catheterization/economicca_ES
dc.subjectRadiation, Ionizingca_ES
dc.subjectFluoroscopyca_ES
dc.subjectCost Savings/economicca_ES
dc.titleImpact of One-Catheter Strategy with TIG I Catheter on Coronary Catheterization Performance and Economic Costsca_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleca_ES
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionca_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessca_ES
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.5935/abc.20190232


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

cc-by, (c) Costa-Mateu et al., 2019
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as cc-by, (c) Costa-Mateu et al., 2019