Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRamos-Morales, Eva
dc.contributor.authorLyons, Laura
dc.contributor.authorde la Fuente Oliver, Gabriel
dc.contributor.authorBraganca, Radek
dc.contributor.authorNewbold, C. Jamie
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-01T07:57:52Z
dc.date.available2019-08-01T07:57:52Z
dc.date.issued2019-07-04
dc.identifier.issn0378-1097
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10459.1/66661
dc.description.abstractThe antiprotozoal effect of saponins varies according to both the structure of the sapogenin and the composition and linkage of the sugar moieties to the sapogenin. The effect of saponins on protozoa has been considered to be transient as it was thought that when saponins were deglycosilated to sapogenins in the rumen they became inactive; however, no studies have yet evaluated the antiprotozoal effect of sapogenins compared to their related saponins. The aims of this study were to evaluate the antiprotozoal effect of eighteen commercially available triterpenoid and steroid saponins and sapogenins in vitro, to investigate the effect of variations in the sugar moiety of related saponins and to compare different sapogenins bearing identical sugar moieties. Our results show that antiprotozoal activity is not an inherent feature of all saponins and that small variations in the structure of a compound can have a significant influence on their biological activity. Some sapogenins (20(S)-protopanaxatriol, asiatic acid and madecassic acid) inhibited protozoa activity to a greater extent than their corresponding saponins (Re and Rh1 and asiaticoside and madecassoside), thus the original hypothesis that the transient nature of the antiprotozoal action of saponins is due to the deglycosilation of saponins needs to be revisited.
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work was supported by the Innovate UK project ‘Ivy for ruminants’ Ref:101091. CJN thanks the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council, UK via grant number BB/J0013/1, for financial support.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherOxford University Press
dc.relation.isformatofReproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1093/femsle/fnz144
dc.relation.ispartofFems Microbiology Letters, 2019, vol. 366, num. 13, p. 1-7
dc.rightscc-by-nc (c) Federation of European Microbiological Societies, 2019
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
dc.subjectAntiprotozoal activity
dc.subjectSapogenins
dc.subjectSaponins
dc.subject.classificationProtozous
dc.subject.classificationEstructura química
dc.subject.otherProtozoa
dc.subject.otherChemical structure
dc.titleNot all saponins have a greater antiprotozoal activity than their related sapogenins
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.date.updated2019-08-01T07:57:52Z
dc.identifier.idgrec028770
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1093/femsle/fnz144


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

cc-by-nc (c) Federation of European Microbiological Societies, 2019
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as cc-by-nc (c) Federation of European Microbiological Societies, 2019