Consistency of impact assessment protocols for non-native species
Vilà, Montserrat (Vilà Planella)
Copp, Gordon H.
Moen, Toril Loennechen
Lucy, Frances E.
Roy, Helen E.
Borges, Paulo Alexandre
Cottier-Cook, Elizabeth Joanne
Juárez Escario, Alejandro
MetadataShow full item record
Standardized tools are needed to identify and prioritize the most harmful non-native species (NNS). A plethora of assessment protocols have been developed to evaluate the current and potential impacts of non-native species, but consistency among them has received limited attention. To estimate the consistency across impact assessment protocols, 89 specialists in biological invasions used 11 protocols to screen 57 NNS (2614 assessments). We tested if the consistency in the impact scoring across assessors, quantified as the coefficient of variation (CV), was dependent on the characteristics of the protocol, the taxonomic group and the expertise of the assessor. Mean CV across assessors was 40%, with a maximum of 223%. CV was lower for protocols with a low number of score levels, which demanded high levels of expertise, and when the assessors had greater expertise on the assessed species. The similarity among protocols with respect to the final scores was higher when the protocols considered the same impact types. We conclude that all protocols led to considerable inconsistency among assessors. In order to improve consistency, we highlight the importance of selecting assessors with high expertise, providing clear guidelines and adequate training but also deriving final decisions collaboratively by consensus.
Is part ofNeobiota, 2019, num. 44, p. 1-25
European research projects
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as cc-by (c) González-Moreno et al., 2019
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Brevik, Eric C.; Richter, Daniel de B.; Verrecchia, Eric P.; Ryan, John; Poch, Rosa M.; Crouvi, Onn; Sauer, Daniela; Waroszewski, Jaroslaw; Solleiro-Rebolledo, Elizabeth; Monger, Curtis; Ottner, Franz; Targulian, Victor (Elsevier, 2015)There are many ways to measure the accomplishments of a scientist, such as papers and books published, citations, and prestige of journals published in, but we rarely gather information that allows us to evaluate the variety ...
Assessing ranked set sampling and ancillary data to improve fruit load estimates in peach orchards Uribeetxebarria Alonso de Armiño, Asier; Martínez Casasnovas, José Antonio; Tisseyre, Bruno; Guillaume, Serge; Escolà i Agustí, Alexandre; Rosell Polo, Joan Ramon; Arnó Satorra, Jaume (Elsevier, 2019-08-08)Fruit load estimation at plot level before harvest is a key issue in fruit growing. To face this challenge, two sampling methods to estimate fruit load in a peach tree orchard were compared: simple random sampling (SRS) ...
Arco, César del; Conesa i Mor, Josep A. (Josep Antoni); Juárez Escario, Alejandro; Pedrol Solanes, Joan; Solé Senan, Xavier Oriol (Fundació Universitat de Lleida, 2014)We assessed the changes in vegetation in an arid area transformed into an artificial wetland in the northeast of the Iberian Peninsula consequence of the construction of a dam in the early twentieth century. We evaluated ...