Crop pests and predators exhibit inconsistent responses to surrounding landscape composition
Fecha de publicación2018-08-02
Karp, Daniel S.
Meehan, Timothy D.
Martin, Emily A.
MetadatosMostrar el registro completo del ítem
The idea that noncrop habitat enhances pest control and represents a win–win opportunity to conserve biodiversity and bolster yields has emerged as an agroecological paradigm. However, while noncrop habitat in landscapes surrounding farms sometimes benefits pest predators, natural enemy responses remain
heterogeneous across studies and effects on pests are inconclusive. The observed heterogeneity in species responses to noncrop habitat may be biological in origin or could result from variation in how habitat and biocontrol are measured. Here, we use a pest-control database encompassing 132 studies and 6,759 sites worldwide to model natural enemy and pest abundances, predation rates, and crop damage as a function of landscape composition. Our results showed that although landscape composition explained significant variation within studies, pest and enemy abundances, predation rates, crop damage, and yields each exhibited different responses across studies, sometimes increasing and sometimes decreasing in landscapes with more noncrop habitat but overall showing no consistent trend. Thus, models that used landscape-composition variables to predict pest-control dynamics demonstrated little potential to explain variation across studies, though prediction did improve when comparing studies with similar crop and landscape features. Overall, our work shows that surrounding noncrop habitat does not consistently improve pest management, meaning habitat conservation may bolster production in some systems and depress yields in others. Future efforts to develop tools that inform farmers when habitat conservation truly represents a win–win would benefit from increased understanding of how landscape effects are modulated by local farm management and the biology of pests and their enemies.
Es parte deProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2018, vol. 115, núm. 33, p. E7863-E7870
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe comocc-by-nc-nd, (c) Karp et al., 2018
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Rubidium marking reveals different patterns of movement in four ground beetle species (Col., Carabidae) between adjacent alfalfa and maize Madeira Nogueira, Filipe; Pons i Domènech, Xavier (The Royal Entomological SocietyJohn Wiley & Sons, 2015-11-17)In the north-east Iberian Peninsula, in summer, arable crop landscapes are characterized by a mosaic of alfalfa and maize. Although carabids are among the main predators in both crops, crop management can affect their ...
Madeira Nogueira, Filipe; Edo-Tena, Eva; Sossai, Samuel; Callizo, Joan; Albajes Garcia, Ramon (SpringerInternational Organization for Biological Control, 2018-10-29)Slow establishment and risks of plant damage are major constraints for the use of the predatory mirid bugs that are commercially available for release in greenhouse crops. Therefore, a new interest has turned towards ...
Prey acceptability and preference of Oenopia conglobata (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae), a candidate for biological control in Urban Green Areas Lumbierres i Bardají, Belén; Madeira Nogueira, Filipe; Pons i Domènech, Xavier (MDPI, 2018)Oenopia conglobata is one of the most common ladybird species in urban green areas of the Mediterranean region. We have obtained data about its prey acceptability and prey preferences. In a laboratory experiment, we ...