Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPérez Lacasta, María José
dc.contributor.authorMartínez Alonso, Montserrat
dc.contributor.authorGarcia, Montse
dc.contributor.authorSala, Maria
dc.contributor.authorPerestelo Pérez, Lilisbeth
dc.contributor.authorVidal, Carmen
dc.contributor.authorCodern-Bové, Núria
dc.contributor.authorFeijoo Cid, Maria
dc.contributor.authorToledo Chávarri, Ana
dc.contributor.authorCardona, Àngels
dc.contributor.authorPons, Anna
dc.contributor.authorCarles Lavila, Misericordia
dc.contributor.authorRué i Monné, Montserrat
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: In Spain, women invited to breast screening are not usually informed about potential harms of screening. The objective of the InforMa study is to assess the effect of receiving information about the benefits and harms of breast screening on informed choice and other decision-making outcomes, in women approaching the age of invitation to mammography screening. METHODS: Two-stage randomised controlled trial. In the first stage, 40 elementary territorial units of the public healthcare system were selected and randomised to intervention or control. In the second stage, women aged 49-50 years were randomly selected. The target sample size was 400 women. Women in the intervention arm received a decision aid (DA) with detailed information on the benefits and harms of screening. Women in the control arm received a standard leaflet that did not mention harms and recommended accepting the invitation to participate in the Breast Cancer Screening Program (BCSP). The primary outcome was informed choice, defined as adequate knowledge and intentions consistent with attitudes. Secondary outcomes included decisional conflict, worry about breast cancer, time perspective, opinions about the DA or the leaflet, and participation in the BCSP. RESULTS: In the intervention group, 23.2% of 203 women made an informed choice compared to only 0.5% of 197 women in the control group (p < 0.001). Attitudes and intentions were similar in both study groups with a high frequency of women intending to be screened, 82.8% vs 82.2% (p = 0.893). Decisional conflict was significantly lower in the intervention group. No differences were observed in confidence in the decision, anxiety, and participation in BCSP. CONCLUSIONS: Women in Spain lack knowledge on the benefits and harms of breast screening. Providing quantitative information on benefits and harms has produced a considerable increase in knowledge and informed choice, with a high acceptance of the informative materials. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Trial identifier NCT03046004 at registry. Registered on February 4 2017. Trial name: InforMa study.
dc.description.sponsorshipThis study was supported by the research grant “Women participation in decisions and strategies on early detection of breast cancer” (PI14/00113) from the Instituto de Salud Carlos III and cofunded by Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional (FEDER) “Una manera de hacer Europa.” Anna Pons received a grant for PhD students from the Lleida Biomedical Research Institute (IRBLleida). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
dc.publisherPublic Library of Science
dc.relation.isformatofReproducció del document publicat a:
dc.relation.ispartofPlos One, 2019, vol. 14, núm. 3, p. e0214057
dc.rightscc-by (c) Pérez Lacasta, María José et al., 2019
dc.subject.otherMama -- Radiografia
dc.subject.otherMama -- Càncer
dc.titleEffect of information about the benefits and harms of mammography on women's decision making: The InforMa randomised controlled trial

Files in this item


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

cc-by (c) Pérez Lacasta, María José et al., 2019
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as cc-by (c) Pérez Lacasta, María José et al., 2019