Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorOchagavía Orbegozo, Helga
dc.contributor.authorPrieto, Paula
dc.contributor.authorSavin, Roxana
dc.contributor.authorGriffiths, Simon
dc.contributor.authorSlafer, Gustavo A.
dc.date.accessioned2019-02-19T12:58:50Z
dc.date.available2019-09-06T22:20:06Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.issn0378-4290
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10459.1/65752
dc.description.abstractVariation in photoperiod sensitivity in wheat plays a major role in the crop adaptation to wide agronomic environments. Photoperiod insensitivity is provided by Ppd-Aa, Ppd-B1a and Ppd-D1a alleles. Effects of the genome, doses and source of the particular Ppd-1a alleles on time to anthesis has not been analysed simultaneously in the same experiments, even less under field conditions; and the effects on particular phases rather than on considering only the total time to anthesis and on phyllochron have not been considered for this range of allele combinations. We carried out field experiments during two consecutive growing seasons to assess differences in time to anthesis, in its component phases, in final leaf number, phyllochron and tillering across wheat isogenic lines differing in specific Ppd alleles and homoeoalleles. In addition to confirming that the introgression of Ppd-1a alleles advanced anthesis time (on average by 307, 251 and 191 °C d if there were 3, 2 or 1 insensitivity alleles introgressed, respectively), we found that the variation between photoperiod insensitive genotypes was largely dependent on the varietal source of Ppd-B1a which could be stronger or weaker than Ppd-D1a depending on the donor considered. All components of time to flowering: the particular sub-phases (P < 0.001) as well final leaf number (P < 0.001) and phyllochron of late-appearing leaves (P < 0.05) were sensitive to Ppd-1a alleles, but the strength of particular alleles on particular components was different, so that similar adjustments in time to anthesis could be achieved with different partitioning of developmental time between the considered phases. We also found that although they did not affect phyllochron of the first 7 leaves, that of the leaves appearing later was consistently reduced in lines carrying Ppd-1a. Tillering was sensitive too, but not final number of spikes due to compensations between tillering and tiller mortality.
dc.description.sponsorshipFunding was provided by ADAPTAWHEAT (a project funded by the European Commission under the 7th Framework Programme for Research and Technological Development) and by project AGL2012-35300 funded by the Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness of Spain. HO held a FPI scholarship from the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation and PP held from University of Lleida scholarship. We wish to thank Ignacio Romagosa for valuable advice in the statistical procedures and Andreu Casellas for excellent technical assistance.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.relationMICINN/PN2008-2011/AGL2012-35300
dc.relation.isformatofVersió postprint del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2017.08.015
dc.relation.ispartofField Crops Research, 2017, vol. 214, p. 45-55
dc.rightscc-by-nc-nd (c) Elsevier, 2017
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es
dc.subjectLeaf number
dc.subjectAnthesis
dc.subjectVegetative
dc.subjectReproductive
dc.titleDuration of developmental phases, and dynamics of leaf appearance and tillering, as affected by source and doses of photoperiod insensitivity alleles in wheat under field conditions
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.date.updated2019-02-19T12:58:51Z
dc.identifier.idgrec025951
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2017.08.015
dc.relation.projectIDinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/FP7/289842


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

cc-by-nc-nd (c) Elsevier, 2017
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as cc-by-nc-nd (c) Elsevier, 2017