Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAbad, Francisco J.
dc.contributor.authorSorrel, Miguel A.
dc.contributor.authorGarcía, Luis Francisco
dc.contributor.authorAluja Fabregat, Antón
dc.date.accessioned2019-01-09T08:51:38Z
dc.date.available2019-01-09T08:51:38Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.issn1073-1911 (print)
dc.identifier.issn1552-3489 (online)
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10459.1/65443
dc.description.abstractContemporary models of personality assume a hierarchical structure in which broader traits contain narrower traits. Individual differences in response styles also constitute a source of score variance. In this study, the bifactor model is applied to separate these sources of variance for personality subscores. The procedure is illustrated using data for two personality inventories—NEO Personality Inventory–Revised and Zuckerman–Kuhlman–Aluja Personality Questionnaire. The inclusion of the acquiescence method factor generally improved the fit to acceptable levels for the Zuckerman–Kuhlman–Aluja Personality Questionnaire, but not for the NEO Personality Inventory–Revised. This effect was higher in subscales where the number of direct and reverse items is not balanced. Loadings on the specific factors were usually smaller than the loadings on the general factor. In some cases, part of the variance was due to domains being different from the main one. This information is of particular interest to researchers as they can identify which subscale scores have more potential to increase predictive validity.ca_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipThe author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: Preparation of this article was supported by Grant PSI2013-44300-P from Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad (Spain) and European Social Fund.ca_ES
dc.language.isoengca_ES
dc.publisherSage Publicationsca_ES
dc.relationMINECO/PN2013-2016/PSI2013-44300-P
dc.relation.isformatofVersió postprint del document publicat a https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191116667547ca_ES
dc.relation.ispartofAssessment, 2018, vol. 25, núm. 8, p. 959-977ca_ES
dc.rights(c) Sage Publications, 2016ca_ES
dc.subjectBig Five structureca_ES
dc.subjectBifactor modelca_ES
dc.subjectResponse stylesca_ES
dc.subjectNEO-PI-Rca_ES
dc.subjectZKA-PQca_ES
dc.titleModeling General, Specific, and Method Variance in Personality Measures: Results for ZKA-PQ and NEO-PI-Rca_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleca_ES
dc.identifier.idgrec026731
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionca_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessca_ES
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1177/1073191116667547


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record