Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRenchon, Alexandre A.
dc.contributor.authorGriebel, Anne
dc.contributor.authorMetzen, Daniel
dc.contributor.authorWilliams, Christopher A.
dc.contributor.authorMedlyn, Belinda E.
dc.contributor.authorDuursma, Remko A.
dc.contributor.authorBarton, Craig V. M.
dc.contributor.authorMaier, Chelsea
dc.contributor.authorBoer, Matthias M.
dc.contributor.authorIsaac, Peter
dc.contributor.authorTissue, David T.
dc.contributor.authorResco de Dios, Víctor
dc.contributor.authorPendall, Elise
dc.date.accessioned2018-12-21T11:19:28Z
dc.date.available2018-12-21T11:19:28Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.issn1726-4170
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10459.1/65394
dc.description.abstractPredicting the seasonal dynamics of ecosystem carbon fluxes is challenging in broadleaved evergreen forests because of their moderate climates and subtle changes in canopy phenology. We assessed the climatic and biotic drivers of the seasonality of net ecosystem–atmosphere CO2 exchange (NEE) of a eucalyptus-dominated forest near Sydney, Australia, using the eddy covariance method. The climate is characterised by a mean annual precipitation of 800mm and a mean annual temperature of 18°C, hot summers and mild winters, with highly variable precipitation. In the 4-year study, the ecosystem was a sink each year (−225gCm−2yr−1 on average, with a standard deviation of 108gCm−2yr−1); inter-annual variations were not related to meteorological conditions. Daily net C uptake was always detected during the cooler, drier winter months (June through August), while net C loss occurred during the warmer, wetter summer months (December through February). Gross primary productivity (GPP) seasonality was low, despite longer days with higher light intensity in summer, because vapour pressure deficit (D) and air temperature (Ta) restricted surface conductance during summer while winter temperatures were still high enough to support photosynthesis. Maximum GPP during ideal environmental conditions was significantly correlated with remotely sensed enhanced vegetation index (EVI; r2 = 0.46) and with canopy leaf area index (LAI; r2= 0.29), which increased rapidly after mid-summer rainfall events. Ecosystem respiration (ER) was highest during summer in wet soils and lowest during winter months. ER had larger seasonal amplitude compared to GPP, and therefore drove the seasonal variation of NEE. Because summer carbon uptake may become increasingly limited by atmospheric demand and high temperature, and because ecosystem respiration could be enhanced by rising temperatures, our results suggest the potential for large-scale seasonal shifts in NEE in sclerophyll vegetation under climate change.
dc.description.sponsorshipThe Australian Education Investment Fund, Australian Terrestrial Ecosystem Research Network, Australian Research Council and Hawkesbury Institute for the Environment at Western Sydney University supported this work. We thank Jason Beringer, Helen Cleugh, Ray Leuning and Eva van Gorsel for advice and support. Senani Karunaratne provided soil classification details.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherCopernicus Publications on behalf of the European Geosciences Union
dc.relation.isformatofReproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-15-3703-2018
dc.relation.ispartofBiogeosciences, 2018, vol. 15, p. 3703-3716
dc.rightscc-by (c) Renchon et al., 2018
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/es
dc.titleUpside-down fluxes Down Under: CO2 net sink in winter and net source in summer in a temperate evergreen broadleaf forest
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.date.updated2018-12-21T11:19:28Z
dc.identifier.idgrec027915
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.5194/bg-15-3703-2018


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

cc-by (c) Renchon et al., 2018
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as cc-by (c) Renchon et al., 2018