Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLecina Brau, Sergio
dc.contributor.authorMartínez-Cob, Antonio
dc.contributor.authorPérez García, Pedro J.
dc.contributor.authorVillalobos, F. J.
dc.contributor.authorBaselga, J. J.
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-12T10:14:54Z
dc.date.available2018-11-12T10:14:54Z
dc.date.issued2003
dc.identifier.issn0378-3774
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10459.1/65078
dc.descriptionIn this paper, daily ET0 estimates at two semiarid locations, Zaragoza and Córdoba, were obtained from the Penman–Monteith equation using either fixed (70 s m−1) or variable rc values. Variable rc values were computed with two models, Katerji and Perrier, and Todorovic. Daily ET0 estimates were computed from 24-h meteorological averages or from the sum of hourly estimates. Daily ET0 measured values were obtained from a weighing lysimeter (Zaragoza) and an eddy covariance system (Córdoba). There was a good agreement at both locations between estimated and measured ET0 values using a fixed rc value and 24-h meteorological averages. Estimates obtained from the sum of hourly estimates were somewhat worse. When 24-h meteorological averages were used, the Katerji and Perrier model for variable rc slightly improved ET0 estimates at both locations. But that improvement does not support the effort to locally calibrate that model. When daily ET0 estimates were obtained from the sum of hourly estimates, the Todorovic model improved the estimation at Zaragoza and, at a lesser degree, at Córdoba. Under the semiarid conditions of the two studied locations, the use of the Todorovic model is recommended to get hourly ET0 estimates from which daily estimates can be obtained. If 24-h meteorological averages are used, a fixed rc value as proposed by Allen et al. [Crop evapotranspiration: guidelines for computing crop water requirements, FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper No. 56, FAO, Rome, 1998] should be enough for accurate ET0 estimates.ca_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work was funded by the projects HID96-1295 and REN2001-1630/CLI (Spanish Ministry of Science and Technology). The first author was also funded with a fellowship from the High Council of Research and Development of the Autonomous Government of Aragón (Spain).ca_ES
dc.language.isoengca_ES
dc.publisherElsevierca_ES
dc.relationMIECU/PN1996-1999/HID96-1295
dc.relationMICYT/PN2000-2003/REN2001-1630/CLI
dc.relation.isformatofVersió postprint del document publicat a https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-3774(02)00174-9ca_ES
dc.relation.ispartofAgricultural Water Management, 2003, vol. 60, núm. 3, p. 181-198ca_ES
dc.rightscc-by-nc-nd (c) Elsevier, 2003ca_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/es
dc.subjectCanopy resistanceca_ES
dc.subjectEvapotranspirationca_ES
dc.subjectPenman–Monteith equationca_ES
dc.titleFixed versus variable bulk canopy resistance for reference evapotranspiration estimation using the Penman-Monteith equation under semiarid conditionsca_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleca_ES
dc.identifier.idgrec001620
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionca_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessca_ES
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-3774(02)00174-9


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

cc-by-nc-nd (c) Elsevier, 2003
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as cc-by-nc-nd (c) Elsevier, 2003