Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPlaza Bonilla, Daniel
dc.contributor.authorÁlvaro-Fuentes, Jorge
dc.contributor.authorArrúe, José Luis
dc.contributor.authorCantero-Martínez, Carlos
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-09T08:25:06Z
dc.date.available2018-11-09T08:25:06Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.issn0167-8809
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10459.1/65061
dc.description.abstractThere is a strong need to identify the combination of tillage and N fertilization practices that reduce the amount of nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions while maintaining crop productivity in dryland Mediterranean areas. We measured the fluxes of N2O in two field experiments with 3 and 15 years since their establishment. In the long-term experiment, two types of tillage (NT, no-tillage, and CT, conventional intensive tillage) and three mineral N fertilization rates (0, 60 and 120 kg N ha−1) were compared. In the short-term experiment, the same tillage systems (CT and NT) and three N fertilization doses (0, 75 and 150 kg N ha−1) and two types of fertilizers (mineral N and organic N with pig slurry) were compared. N2O emissions, water-filled pore space, soil mineral N content, grain yields, N-biomass inputs and soil total nitrogen (STN) stocks were quantified and the N2O yield-scaled ratio as kg of CO2 equivalents per kg of grain produced was calculated. In both experiments tillage treatments significantly affected the dynamics of N2O fluxes. Cumulative losses of N as N2O were similar between tillage treatments in the long-term field experiment. Contrarily, although not significant, cumulative N losses were about 35% greater under NT than CT in the short-term experiment. NT significantly increased the production of grain and the inputs of N to the soil as above-ground biomass in both experiments. Averaged across fertilizer treatments, CT emitted 0.362 and 0.104 kg CO2 equiv. kg grain−1 in the long-term and the short-term experiment, respectively, significantly more than NT that emitted 0.033 and 0.056 kg CO2 equiv. kg grain−1, respectively. Nitrogen fertilization rates did not affect the average N2O fluxes or the total N losses during the period of gas measurement in the long-term experiment. Contrarily, in the short-term experiment, N2O emissions increased with application rate for both mineral and organic fertilizers. The use of pig slurry increased grain production when compared with the mineral N treatment, thus reducing the yield-scaled emissions of N2O by 44%. Our results showed that in rainfed Mediterranean agroecosystems, the use of NT and pig slurry are effective means of yield-scaled N2O emissions reduction.ca_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipThis research was supported by the Comisión Interministerial de Ciencia y Tecnología of Spain (grants AGL 2007-66320-C02-01 and AGL 2010-22050-C03-01/02), the Aragon Government and La Caixa (grant GA-LC-050/2011), the Department of Agriculture of the Catalonia Government (grant 2012 AGEC 00012) and the European Union (FEDER funds).ca_ES
dc.language.isoengca_ES
dc.publisherElsevierca_ES
dc.relationMIECI/PN2004-2007/AGL2007-66320-C02-01
dc.relationMICINN/PN2008-2011/AGL2010-22050-C03-01/02
dc.relation.isformatofVersió postprint del document publicat a https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2014.03.023ca_ES
dc.relation.ispartofAgriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2014, vol. 189, p. 43–52ca_ES
dc.rightscc-by-nc-nd (c) Elsevier, 2014ca_ES
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subjectNitrous oxideca_ES
dc.subjectMediterraneanca_ES
dc.subjectNitrogen fertilizationca_ES
dc.subjectTillageca_ES
dc.titleTillage and nitrogen fertilization effects on nitrous oxide yield-scaled emissions in a rainfed Mediterranean areaca_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleca_ES
dc.identifier.idgrec021994
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionca_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessca_ES
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2014.03.023


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

cc-by-nc-nd (c) Elsevier, 2014
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as cc-by-nc-nd (c) Elsevier, 2014