Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTorrent Martí, Xavier
dc.contributor.authorGarcerá, Cruz
dc.contributor.authorMoltó García, Enrique
dc.contributor.authorChueca Adell, Patricia
dc.contributor.authorAbad, Raquel
dc.contributor.authorGrafulla, Carmen
dc.contributor.authorRomán, Carla
dc.contributor.authorPlanas de Martí, Santiago
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-06T10:52:38Z
dc.date.available2019-02-20T23:23:01Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.issn0261-2194
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10459.1/65033
dc.description.abstractThe objective of this study was to evaluate and to compare spray drift potential and field spray drift from pesticide application in citrus orchards carried out mainly comparing standard nozzles with drift reducing nozzles. Two different standard nozzles (hollow cone and full cone) and one Venturi drift reducing nozzle (hollow cone) were tested. Spray drift potential was measured by means of wind tunnel experiments (ISO 22856:2008 method). To estimate field airborne and sedimenting spray drift, two trials with 5 replicates each were carried out (ISO 22866:2005 method) in two different commercial orchards of Clementine mandarins. Results showed that Venturi nozzles significantly reduced drift with the two methodologies. Moreover, the wind tunnel method showed the same trend as the field results. Additionally, spray drift deposition variability was lower for the Venturi nozzles. Therefore, it could be concluded that Venturi nozzles can be recommended to be used in citrus orchards to prevent human and environmental risks and their use could be appropriate for different scenarios where spray drift risk must be mitigated.
dc.description.sponsorshipAuthors would like to thank to Cítrics Terres de l’Ebre, S.A.T. and Manantiales Entrepinos, S.L. for allowing the use of their fields and sprayers. Also, Agrícola la Realense Coop.V. for allowing the use of their fields and Pulverizadores Fede S.A. for the use of equipments. Besides, Universitat de Lleida is also thanked for Mr. X. Torrent's pre-doctoral fellowship.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.relation.isformatofVersió postprint del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2017.02.001
dc.relation.ispartofCrop Protection, 2017, vol. 96, p. 130-143
dc.rightscc-by-nc-nd (c) Elsevier, 2017
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subjectDrift potential reduction
dc.subjectAirblast sprayer
dc.subjectVenturi nozzle
dc.subjectAirborne drift
dc.subjectSedimenting drift
dc.titleComparison between standard and drift reducing nozzles for pesticide application in citrus: Part I. Effects on wind tunnel and field spray drift
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.date.updated2018-11-06T10:52:38Z
dc.identifier.idgrec025367
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2017.02.001


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

cc-by-nc-nd (c) Elsevier, 2017
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as cc-by-nc-nd (c) Elsevier, 2017