Weed resistance to synthetic auxin herbicides

Thumbnail
View/Open
Issue date
2018
Author
Busi, Roberto
Goggin, Danica E.
Heap, Ian
Horak, Michael
Jugulam, Mithila
Masters, Robert
Napier, Richard
Riar, Dilpreet S.
Satchivi, Norbert
Torra Farré, Joel
Westra, Philip
Wright, Terry R.
Suggested citation
Busi, Roberto; Goggin, Danica E.; Heap, Ian; Horak, Michael; Jugulam, Mithila; Masters, Robert; ... Wright, Terry R.. (2018) . Weed resistance to synthetic auxin herbicides. Pest Management Science, 2018, vol 74 (10), p. 2265-2276. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.4823.
Impact

Google Scholar logo  Google Scholar
Share
Export to Mendeley
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
Herbicides classified as synthetic auxins have been most commonly used to control broadleaf weeds in a variety of crops and in non-cropland areas since the first synthetic auxin herbicide (SAH), 2,4-D, was introduced to the market in the mid-1940s. The incidence of weed species resistant to SAHs is
relatively low considering their long-term global application with 29 broadleaf weed species confirmed resistant to date. An understanding of the context and mechanisms of SAH resistance evolution can inform management practices to sustain the longevity and utility of this important class of herbicides. A symposium was convened during the 2nd Global Herbicide Resistance Challenge (May 2017 in Denver, CO, USA) to provide an overview of the current state of knowledge of SAH resistance mechanisms including case studies of weed species resistant to SAHs and perspectives on mitigating resistance development in SAH-tolerant crops.
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/10459.1/60761
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.4823
Is part of
Pest Management Science, 2018, vol 74 (10), p. 2265-2276
Collections
cc-by (c) Busi et al., 2017
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as cc-by (c) Busi et al., 2017