Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDíaz Gómez, Joana
dc.contributor.authorMoreno Martínez, José Antonio
dc.contributor.authorAngulo Asensio, Eduardo
dc.contributor.authorSandmann, Gerhard
dc.contributor.authorZhu, Changfu
dc.contributor.authorRamos Girona, Antonio J.
dc.contributor.authorCapell Capell, Teresa
dc.contributor.authorChristou, Paul
dc.contributor.authorNogareda, Carmina
dc.date.accessioned2017-07-04T07:31:47Z
dc.date.available2018-06-12T22:19:33Z
dc.date.issued2017-06-12
dc.identifier.issn0377-8401
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10459.1/59978
dc.description.abstractSkin color in poultry is achieved by the addition of natural or synthetic pigments to feed. Crops used routinely in feed formulations offer an alternative cost-effective strategy to replace color additives if they are biofortified with sufficient levels of carotenoids. We tested the hypothesis that high-carotenoid (HC) maize, which was genetically engineered to accumulate high levels of β‐carotene, lutein and zeaxanthin in the endosperm, can replace carotenoid additives in poultry feed by performing two feeding trials using diets incorporating different maize lines with diverse carotenoid compositions: control (wild-type M37W, the parental line), HC, and standard yellow commercial maize supplemented with color additives (marigold flowers and red paprika extracts). The effects of dietary treatments on growth performance, health parameters, color evolution and carotenoid distribution were determined. We found that chickens fed on the HC diet grew normally and developed similar pigmentation to animals fed on a commercial diet supplemented with color additives, although yellowness was significantly higher in the commercial diet due to the high concentration of yellow xanthophylls. Lightness scores in chickens fed on the control, HC and commercial diets were 45.88 ± 1.31, 44.32 ± 1.10 and 44.29 ± 0.99, respectively, in breast muscle, and 51.62 ± 1.33, 49.66 ± 0.96 and 50.10 ± 1.16, respectively, in thigh muscle. Redness scores in chickens fed on the control, HC, and commercial diets were 0.36 ± 0.26, 3.25 ± 0.29 and 3.58 ± 0.29, respectively, in breast muscle, and 1.28 ± 0.37, 4.79 ± 0.39 and 4.85 ± 0.34, respectively, in thigh muscle. Yellowness scores in chickens fed on the control, HC, and commercial diets were 2.45 ± 0.47, 7.61 ± 0.64 and 9.66 ± 0.73, respectively, in breast muscle, and 3.38 ± 0.64, 10.00 ± 1.10 and 12.64 ± 0.97, respectively, in thigh muscle. High-carotenoid maize is therefore a cost-effective alternative to feed supplementation in the poultry industry.
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work was supported by La Caixa (Recercaixa project PC084082 VitaMaize: High quality and safe food through antioxidant fortified maize), the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (BIO2014-54426-P; BIO2014-54441-P, FEDER funds) and the Catalan Government (2014 SGR 1296 Agricultural Biotechnology Research Group).
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherElsevier B.V.
dc.relationMINECO/PN2013-2016/BIO2014-54426-P
dc.relationMINECO/PN2013-2016/BIO2014-54441-P
dc.relation.isformatofVersió postprint del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2017.06.007
dc.relation.ispartofAnimal Feed Science and Technology, 2017, vol. 231, p. 38-46
dc.rightscc-by-nc-nd, (c) Elsevier, 2017
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subjectChicken
dc.subjectBiofortification
dc.subjectCarotenoids
dc.subjectMetabolic engineering
dc.titleHigh-carotenoid biofortified maize is an alternative to color additives in poultry feed
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.date.updated2017-07-04T07:31:49Z
dc.identifier.idgrec025758
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2017.06.007


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

cc-by-nc-nd, (c) Elsevier, 2017
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as cc-by-nc-nd, (c) Elsevier, 2017