Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGodoy i García, Pere
dc.contributor.authorGarcía Cenoz, M.
dc.contributor.authorToledo, Diana
dc.contributor.authorCarmona, Gloria
dc.contributor.authorCaylà, Joan A.
dc.contributor.authorAlsedà Graells, Miquel
dc.contributor.authorÀlvarez, J.
dc.contributor.authorBarrabeig i Fabregat, Irene
dc.contributor.authorCamps, Neus
dc.contributor.authorPlans, P.
dc.contributor.authorCompany, M.
dc.contributor.authorCastilla, Jesús
dc.contributor.authorSala Farré, M.
dc.contributor.authorMuñoz Almagro, C.
dc.contributor.authorRius, C.
dc.contributor.authorDomínguez, A.
dc.date.accessioned2016-12-13T08:47:46Z
dc.date.available2016-12-13T08:47:46Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.issn1560-7917
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10459.1/58802
dc.description.abstractWe aimed to investigate transmission rates of pertussis in household contacts of cases and factors associated with transmission. A prospective epidemiological study was conducted in 2012 and 2013 to determine the incidence of pertussis among household contacts of reported cases in Catalonia and Navarre, Spain. An epidemiological survey was completed for each case and contact, who were followed for 28 days to determine the source of infection (primary case) and detect the occurrence of secondary cases. Odds ratios (ORs) were used to estimate the effectiveness of vaccination and chemoprophylaxis in preventing new cases, using the formula (1 − OR) × 100. For the 688 primary cases, a total of 2,852 contacts were recorded. The household transmission rate was 16.1% (459/2,852) and rose according to the age (> 18 years) and lack of immunisation of the primary cases, and also the age (0–18 years), family relationship (siblings and children), lack of vaccination and chemoprophylaxis of contacts. Pertussis vaccine effectiveness in preventing new cases was 65.0% (95% confidence interval (CI): 11.6 to 86.2) for full vaccination (≥ 4 doses) and 59.7% (95% CI: −6.8 to 84.8) for incomplete vaccination (< 4 doses). The effectiveness of chemoprophylaxis was 62.1% (95% CI: 40.3 to 75.9). To reduce household transmission, contacts should be investigated to detect further cases and to administer chemoprophylaxis. The current vaccination status of cases and contacts can reduce household transmission.ca_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipThis study was supported by the Ministry of Science and Innovation, Institute of Health Carlos III (Project PI11/02557) and Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional (FEDER-Una manera de hacer Europa).ca_ES
dc.language.isoengca_ES
dc.publisherEurosurveillanceca_ES
dc.relation.isformatofReproducció del document publicat a https://doi.org/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2016.21.45.30393ca_ES
dc.relation.ispartofEurosurveillance, 2016, vol. 21, núm. 45, p. 24-33ca_ES
dc.rightscc-by (c) Godoy, Pere. et al., 2016ca_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.titleFactors influencing the spread of pertussis in households: a prospective study, Catalonia and Navarre, Spain, 2012 to 2013ca_ES
dc.typearticleca_ES
dc.type.versionpublishedVersionca_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessca_ES
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2016.21.45.30393


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

cc-by (c) Godoy, Pere. et al., 2016
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as cc-by (c) Godoy, Pere. et al., 2016