Harvester ant (Messor barbarus (L.)) density as related to soil properties, topography and management in semi-arid cereals

Baraibar Padró, Bàrbara; Torra Farré, Joel; Westerman, Paula Renate

doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2011.08.012

Visualitza/Obre

017318.pdf (263.1Kb)
Sol·licita una còpia

Data de publicació

2011

Autor/a

Baraibar Padró, Bàrbara

Torra Farré, Joel

Westerman, Paula Renate

Citació recomanada

Baraibar Padró, Bàrbara; Torra Farré, Joel; Westerman, Paula Renate; . (2011) . Harvester ant (Messor barbarus (L.)) density as related to soil properties, topography and management in semi-arid cereals. Applied Soil Ecology, 2011, vol. 51, p. 60-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2011.08.012.

Resum

Harvester ants are important weed seed predators in semi-arid cereal fields. Densities of harvester ants vary considerably across fields and so do concomitant weed seed predation rates, however, causes for variability are largely unknown. Understanding the factors that affect ant density may help to identify areas where high natural weed seed control is likely and management factors that could help to enhance ant densities where they are low. Messor barbarus ant density was approximated by estimates of nest density and nest size, and these were correlated to different edaphic, topographic and crop management factors in 34 no-till and 6 minimally tilled cereal fields. The number of years since conversion to no-till explained 12.6% of variability in ant nest density. No other variable could explain nest densities. M. barbarus ant and nest densities increased with increasing number of years of no-till, reached a peak at 11–12 years, after which densities decreased again. Overcompensation by a large cohort of newly established queens could provide an explanation for this observation. Other factors not included in this study, in particular food (seeds) availability, may play an additional role in determining ant density.

URI

http://hdl.handle.net/10459.1/58623

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2011.08.012

És part de

Applied Soil Ecology, 2011, vol. 51, p. 60-65