Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRathgeber, Christoph
dc.contributor.authorHiebler, Stefan
dc.contributor.authorLävemann, Eberhard
dc.contributor.authorDolado, Pablo
dc.contributor.authorLazaro, Ana
dc.contributor.authorGasia, Jaume
dc.contributor.authorGracia Cuesta, Alvaro de
dc.contributor.authorMiró, Laia
dc.contributor.authorCabeza, Luisa F.
dc.contributor.authorKönig-Haagen, Andreas
dc.contributor.authorBrüggemann, Dieter
dc.contributor.authorCampos-Celador, Álvaro
dc.contributor.authorFranquet, Erwin
dc.contributor.authorFumey, Benjamin
dc.contributor.authorDannemand, Mark
dc.contributor.authorBadenhop, Thomas
dc.contributor.authorDiriken, Jan
dc.contributor.authorNielsen, Jan Erik
dc.contributor.authorHauer, Andreas
dc.date.accessioned2016-09-28T08:05:56Z
dc.date.available2016-09-28T08:05:56Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.issn1876-6102
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10459.1/57844
dc.descriptionProceedings of the 4th International Conference on Solar Heating and Cooling for Buildings and Industry (SHC 2015)ca_ES
dc.description.abstractWithin the framework of IEA SHC Task 42 / ECES Annex 29, a simple tool for the economic evaluation of thermal energy storages has been developed and tested on various existing storages. On that account, the storage capacity costs (costs per installed storage capacity) of thermal energy storages have been evaluated via a Top-down and a Bottom-up approach. The Top-down approach follows the assumption that the costs of energy supplied by the storage should not exceed the costs of energy from the market. The maximum acceptable storage capacity costs depend on the interest rate assigned to the capital costs, the intended payback period of the user class (e.g. industry or building), the reference energy costs, and the annual number of storage cycles. The Bottom-up approach focuses on the realised storage capacity costs of existing storages. The economic evaluation via Top-down and Bottom-up approach is a valuable tool to make a rough estimate of the economic viability of an energy storage for a specific application. An important finding is that the annual number of storage cycles has the largest influence on the cost effectiveness. At present and with respect to the investigated storages, seasonal heat storage is only economical via large sensible hot water storages. Contrary, if the annual number of storage cycles is sufficiently high, all thermal energy storage technologies can become competitive.ca_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipThis study is part of IEA SHC Task 42 / ECES Annex 29 „Compact Thermal Energy Storage - Material Development and System Integration“ (http://task42.iea-shc.org). The work of ZAE Bayern is part of the project PC-Cools_V and supported by the German Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy under the project code 03ESP138A. University of Zaragoza thanks the Spanish Government for the funding of their work under the projects ENE2008-06687-C02-02, ENE2011-28269-C03-01 and ENE2014-57262-R. University of Lleida would like to thank the Catalan Government for the quality accreditation given to their research group (2014 SGR 123). The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Union's Seventh Framework Program (FP7/2007-2013) under grant agreement n° PIRSES-GA-2013-610692 (INNOSTORAGE) and European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovationprogramme under grant agreement No 657466 (INPATH-TES). Laia Miró would like to thank the Spanish Government for her research fellowship (BES-2012-051861). The University of the Basque Country acknowledges the financial support of the Spanish’s Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness through the MicroTES (ENE2012- 38633) research project. The responsibility for the content of this publication is with the authorsca_ES
dc.language.isoengca_ES
dc.publisherElsevierca_ES
dc.relationMICINN/PN2008-2011/ENE2008-06687-C02-02ca_ES
dc.relationMICINN/PN2008-2011/ENE2011-28269-C03-01ca_ES
dc.relation.isformatofReproducció del document publicat a https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2016.06.203ca_ES
dc.relation.ispartofEnergy Procedia, 2016, vol. 91, p. 197-206ca_ES
dc.rightscc-by-nc-nd (c) Christoph Rathgeber et al., 2016ca_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/*
dc.subjectSensible heat storageca_ES
dc.subjectLatent heat storageca_ES
dc.subjectThermochemical heat storageca_ES
dc.subjectStorage capacity costsca_ES
dc.titleIEA SHC Task 42 / ECES Annex 29 – A Simple Tool for the Economic Evaluation of Thermal Energy Storagesca_ES
dc.typearticleca_ES
dc.identifier.idgrec025088
dc.type.versionpublishedVersionca_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessca_ES
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2016.06.203
dc.relation.projectIDinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/FP7/610692ca_ES
dc.relation.projectIDinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/H2020/657466/EU/INPATH-TES


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

cc-by-nc-nd (c) Christoph Rathgeber et al., 2016
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as cc-by-nc-nd (c) Christoph Rathgeber et al., 2016