IEA SHC Task 42 / ECES Annex 29 – A Simple Tool for the Economic Evaluation of Thermal Energy Storages
Nielsen, Jan Erik
MetadataShow full item record
Within the framework of IEA SHC Task 42 / ECES Annex 29, a simple tool for the economic evaluation of thermal energy storages has been developed and tested on various existing storages. On that account, the storage capacity costs (costs per installed storage capacity) of thermal energy storages have been evaluated via a Top-down and a Bottom-up approach. The Top-down approach follows the assumption that the costs of energy supplied by the storage should not exceed the costs of energy from the market. The maximum acceptable storage capacity costs depend on the interest rate assigned to the capital costs, the intended payback period of the user class (e.g. industry or building), the reference energy costs, and the annual number of storage cycles. The Bottom-up approach focuses on the realised storage capacity costs of existing storages. The economic evaluation via Top-down and Bottom-up approach is a valuable tool to make a rough estimate of the economic viability of an energy storage for a specific application. An important finding is that the annual number of storage cycles has the largest influence on the cost effectiveness. At present and with respect to the investigated storages, seasonal heat storage is only economical via large sensible hot water storages. Contrary, if the annual number of storage cycles is sufficiently high, all thermal energy storage technologies can become competitive.
NoteProceedings of the 4th International Conference on Solar Heating and Cooling for Buildings and Industry (SHC 2015)
Is part ofEnergy Procedia, 2016, vol. 91, p. 197-206
European research projects
The following license files are associated with this item:
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as cc-by-nc-nd (c) Christoph Rathgeber et al., 2016
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Enthalpy-temperature plots to compare calorimetric measurements of phase change materials at different sample scales Rathgeber, Christoph; Schmit, Henri; Miró, Laia; Cabeza, Luisa F.; Gutiérrez, Andrea; Ushak, Svetlana; Hiebler, Stefan (Elsevier, 2018)Phase change materials (PCM) can provide high thermal energy storage capacities in narrow temperature ranges around their phase change temperature. The expectable maximum storage capacity of a PCM in a defined temperature ...
Experimental devices to investigate the long‐term stability of phase change materials under application conditions Rathgeber, Christoph; Hiebler, Stefan; Bayón, Rocío; Cabeza, Luisa F.; Zsembinszki, Gabriel; Englmair, Gerald; Dannemand, Mark; Diarce, Gonzalo; Fellmann, Oliver; Ravott, Rebecca; Groulx, Dominic; Kheirabadi, Ali C.; Gschwander, Stefan; Höhlein, Stephan; König-Haagen, Andreas; Baupere, Noé; Zalewski, Laurent (MDPI, 2020)An important prerequisite to select a reliable phase change material (PCM) for thermal energy storage applications is to test it under application conditions. In the case of solid-liquid PCM, a large amount of thermal ...
Cabeza, Luisa F.; Miró, Laia; Oró Prim, Eduard; Gracia Cuesta, Alvaro de; Martin, Viktoria; Krönauer, Andreas; Rathgeber, Christoph; Farid, Mohammed M.; Paksoy, Halime Ö.; Martínez, Mònica; Fernández Renna, Ana Inés (Elsevier, 2015)According to the IPCC, societies can respond to climate changes by adapting to its impacts and by mitigation, that is, by reducing GHG emissions. No single technology can provide all of the mitigation potential in any ...