Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMorell Soler, Francisco Joaquín
dc.contributor.authorLampurlanés Castel, Jorge
dc.contributor.authorÁlvaro-Fuentes, Jorge
dc.contributor.authorCantero-Martínez, Carlos
dc.date.accessioned2016-06-06T10:47:40Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.identifier.issn0167-1987
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10459.1/57164
dc.description.abstractConservation tillage systems (no-tillage, NT; and minimum tillage, MT) are being adopted in rainfed agroecosystems of the Mediterranean basin where water availability is the main limiting factor for crop productivity. We hypothesized that long-term adoption of conservation tillage systems would increase water use efficiency (WUE) and its response to N fertilizer additions due to improved soil water content. A field experiment was established in 1996 on a loamy Xerofluvent Typic in the Ebro river valley (NE Spain). The experiment compared three nitrogen (N) fertilization levels (zero, 0 kg N ha 1, medium, 60 kg N ha 1, and high, 120 kg N ha 1), under three tillage systems (CT, conventional tillage; MT and NT), annually cropped to barley (Hordeum vulgare, L.) as is usual in the region. Ten years after the experiment establishment, during four consecutive growing seasons, 2005–2006 to 2008–2009, we evaluated the response of soil water content, soil nitrate, above-ground dry matter, grain yield and yield components to long-term (>10 years) tillage and N fertilization treatments. The long-term sustainability of NT and MT was confirmed. Mean yield and WUE under long-term conservation tillage systems were 66% and 57% higher than under CT, respectively. This improvement was mainly attributed to improved soil water usage under conservation tillage, mainly due to reduced water use during the pre-anthesis period. However, in a wet year yield did not significantly differ among tillage systems. The improvement of WUE with N fertilization was confirmed under NT, which medium and high N fertilizer level increased 98% mean grain yield and 77% mean WUE compared to CT. The increased response of crop and yield to N fertilization under NT was due to improved soil water content. Soil N accumulation together with the lower water accumulation explained the lack of response to N fertilization under CT, even on a wet growing season (i.e., 2008–2009). Long-term NT adoption was a sustainable practice for barley monoculture in the region, allowing for reduced costs and yield increase with N fertilizer additions. N fertilizer rates on rainfed Mediterranean croplands should be adjusted depending on the reduction of tillage intensity and rainfall of the year. In our system and as an example for this agroecosystems, N fertilizer rates should be kept at or below 60 kg N ha 1, and should be further reduced on intensively cultivated soils.ca_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work was supported with by the Comision Interministerial de Ciencia y Tecnologia of Spain (Grants AGL 2004-07763-C02-02 and AGL2007-66320-CO2-02/AGR).ca_ES
dc.language.isoengca_ES
dc.publisherElsevierca_ES
dc.relationMIECI/PN2004-2007/AGL2004-07763-C02-02ca_ES
dc.relationMIECI/PN2004-2007/AGL2007-66320-C02-02/AGRca_ES
dc.relation.isformatofVersió postprint del document publicat a https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2011.09.002ca_ES
dc.relation.ispartofSoil and Tillage Research, 2011, vol. 117, p. 76-84ca_ES
dc.rightscc-by-nc-nd (c) Elsevier, 2011ca_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subjectDrylandca_ES
dc.subjectWinter cerealca_ES
dc.subjectSoil mineral nitrogenca_ES
dc.titleYield and water use efficiency of barley in a semiarid Mediterranean agroecosystem: long-term effects of tillage and N fertilizationca_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleca_ES
dc.identifier.idgrec017566
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionca_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessca_ES
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2011.09.002


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

cc-by-nc-nd (c) Elsevier, 2011
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as cc-by-nc-nd (c) Elsevier, 2011